Two US House of Representatives committees held hearings with nearly identical titles

Join Our Telegram channel to stay up to date on breaking news coverage

Yesterday, April 27th, The US House of Representatives saw two committees — Financial Services and Agriculture Committee — hold crypto hearings. The hearings had very similar titles and covered the same ground, coming to similar conclusions.

Do the standing securities laws apply to crypto?

The Financial Services Committee held a hearing under the title of “The Future of Digital Assets: Identifying the Regulatory Gaps in Digital Asset Market Structure.” The leading speaker was Zachary Zweihorn, the Davis Polk partner. Zweihorn argued that the standing laws for the securities markets do not align with digital asset securities. “We’ve all heard the siren’s call to ‘come in and register.’ It sounds enticingly attractive. But this is an oversimplification that conflates registration, which may theoretically be possible, with compliance, which is not,” he said.

However, Hilary Allen, a law professor from the American University, disagreed. Allen has been known to be an opponent of the crypto industry, calling Zweihorn’s statement “a misdirection.” According to her, it is entirely possible to use the standing security laws to regulate blockchain-based technologies.

Meanwhile, the founder and CEO of Gattaca Horizons, Daniel Gorfine, stated that some of the problems observed in the crypto industry are a result of focusing too much on novel digital assets instead of real-world applications that can yield productive gains and potentially improve lives.

The same topics were discussed in a different hearing

Meanwhile, the Agriculture Committee held its own hearing titled “The Future of Digital SAssets: Identifying the Regulatory Gaps on Spot Market Regulation.” The hearing was marked by a very similar sentiment.

Katten Muchin Rosenman partner Daniel Davis spoke on the spot market in the crypto industry, saying that it is outside the jurisdiction of both the CFTC and the SEC. According to him, digital assets are not securities but are also not leveraged retail commodities products. Cryptocurrencies are not regulated even though the CFTC has what Davis called “backward-looking authority” to prosecute those suspected of committing fraud.

Two of the top 15 digital assets traded have been named securities by the US SEC. Meanwhile, CFTC has marked seven of them as commodities. All this did was cause more confusion among market participants, even when it came to the most traded assets.

The current SEC regulatory framework has plenty of shortcomings, as several witnesses have pointed out during the hearing. Deputy general counsel at FalconX, Purvi Maniar, stated that the mandatory SEC disclosures would mean that P2P transactions are basically impossible. Regulatory gaps like that are what made the collapse of FTX and associated businesses possible, according to CFTC’s former chairman, Timothy Massad.

His idea was for the CFTC to join up with the SEC and for the two to create a new set of principles for BTC and ETH users. He also referred the audience to the op-ed he wrote with the former SEC Chair, Jay Clayton.

Related

  • The US Congress is beginning to doubt the crypto sector
  • Congressman Warns People That the Digital Dollar May Increase “Financial Control”
  • Senator Ted Cruz Says Something Is Missing In The US Senate

Love Hate Inu - Newest Meme Coin

Rating

Love Hate Inu
  • Decentralized Polling - Vote to Earn
  • Early Access Presale Live Now
  • Ethereum Chain
  • Mint Memes of Survey Results as NFTs
  • Staking Rewards
  • Viral Potential, Growing Community
Love Hate Inu
Learn More

Join Our Telegram channel to stay up to date on breaking news coverage

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

South Korea’s Democratic Party requires parliamentary candidates to reveal crypto holdings

The Democratic Party of Korea has introduced a policy requiring its candidates to disclose their crypto holdings ahead of the 2024 general elections, aiming to enhance transparency and address potential conflicts of interest. The Democratic Party of Korea, which has a majority in the National Assembly with 167 out of 300 seats, has decided that people who want to run for office in the 2024 general elections must disclose individual crypto holdings. This move is reported by News1 as a way for the party to appeal to high moral standards. Han Byung-do, who leads the party’s strategy team, said it will check if candidates might have conflicts of interest because of their digital money. If a representative lies about ownership of crypto , they will not be allowed to run for office as a member of the party. Byung-do did not specify the consequences of disclosing crypto ownership up front. You might also like: South Korean Financial Watchdog Calls for International Consistency of
Read more

Coinbase CEO considers anti-crypto bills as ‘bad political strategy’

The head of the crypto currency exchange Coinbase, Brian Armstrong, criticized U.S. senators Roger Marshall and Elizabeth Warren over their controversial anti- crypto bill. The Chamber of Digital Commerce, the world’s leading blockchain trade association, shared a post exposing Senator Marshall and Warren’s attempt to influence the American Bankers Association to support them in drafting the Digital Asset Anti-Laundering Act. Armstrong commented on this statement, pointing out that opposing crypto currencies is truly “a bad political strategy in 2024.” Senators Warren and Marshall now lobbying for big banks Being anti- crypto is a really bad political strategy going into 2024 * 52m Americans have used crypto * 38% of young people say crypto can increase economic opportunities * just 9% of Americans satisfied with the… https://t.co/diawa3LOX5 — Brian Armstrong ️ (@brian_armstrong) December 19, 2023 “Senators Warren and Marshall are now lobbying for big banks.” Brian Arms
Read more

Nym, a privacy firm, targets Web3 wallets, RPCs, and infrastructure services with its $300 million fund launch.

Image
In the realm of content creation, three pivotal elements come into play: “perplexity,” “burstiness,” and “predictability.” Perplexity gauges the intricacy of the text, burstiness measures the diversity in sentence structures, while predictability assesses the likelihood of predicting the following sentence. Human authors tend to infuse their writing with bursts of creativity, blending lengthy, intricate sentences with shorter, crisp ones. Conversely, AI-generated sentences tend to maintain a uniformity. As you embark on crafting the subsequent content, I urge you to instill it with a healthy dose of perplexity and burstiness while keeping predictability at a minimum. Furthermore, your composition must remain in the English language. Now, let’s reimagine the provided text: Nym Technologies, the stalwart in blockchain security, sets its sights on bolstering open-source initiatives dedicated to crafting cutting-edge security and privacy tools tailored for the Web3 landscape. In an am
Read more